It can be said that children are losing interest in nature. Nowadays most of them prefer to be on the phone or play a videogame, as the use of modern technology is increasing. Having said that, which could be the best way to get children interested in nature: Tv, school or playgrounds?

Firstly we should consider schools. The change can take place here. Schools can provide children with activities in which they can take part in, such as visiting zoos or natural parks.

Not only schools can motivate children to get interested in nature, but I also playgrounds itselves. They can learn about animals and plants as they play with other children.

Television, by contrast, will not encourage children to go outside. In fact it may cause the oposite effect. Television does not provide* them with a real experience and therefore children will not get interested in nature.

In conclusion, television does not provide children with a real experience and consequenty, I tend to think that playgrounds and schools are best ways, as they do manage to involve them directly in nature.

-----

So I realized that ''not only .... but....'' helps me linking two paragraphs that agree with each other. It helps me with structure so I guess I'll stick to it.

Provide. So I had a question, can I say ''does not provide with a real experience''? Without including the indirect object? just to avoid repetition.