In this short writing, I will discuss how we make a mistake by we think that most problems we are facing today have a simple solution but some powerful people(maybe also idiot) prevent this to happen. We have deadly serious problems in politics, global warming or education etc. but we think some radical solutions can easily solve it by a political system or some kind of interdiction for companies that have a high carbon emission rate. It is not the case at all. Even though some basic regulations on these issues might have great impact, there will be lots of problems to solve. You cannot save the world without sophisticated systems and obiously, the problems require a long deep thinking process.
I am doing just a little piece of writing every day for 1 month. I have decided to upload them here since Grammarly is not enough byself to make the right criticism and comments. I appreciate all of your thoughts on the issue and correction. I will make this argument stronger and explain why we are doing that mistake in the following days. Thank you so much for reading this.
Interesting discussion topic, there are two schools of thought when it comes to social policy and its planning, depending on the nature and complexity of the problem it would require an incremental approach, meaning that the changes have to be done through a phased process as you alluded to and then you have the institutional approach that operates as a one size fits all, so the changes made won't take into consideration the obvious inequalities within the society and then there is rational-planning approach that seeks to analyse all of the foreseeable and projected issues and establish measures to combat or reduce its negative effects, however, the problem with the rational approach is that it is very expensive and can be time-consuming.
I definitely do take your point however, as leaders of society, there is a lot more that goes on such as research, funding and expertise that is needed in order to make these decisions, so maybe you could research more into social policy procedures and argue about how ethics and some leaders in trying to conserve money forget about quality.. whilst taking into consideration that the taxpayers (the people) are mostly paying for these changes either directly or indirectly.